Last post from old apartment
Hopefully we'll be done by lunch time then we can treat everyone to lunch and pick up some stuff from Ikea or Walmart for the new apt. Okies, will post pictures of the new VS old place soon!
Ciao :)
| By Jonathan Amos BBC News science reporter |
The 20cm-long, 3cm-wide stone object, which is dated to be about 28,000 years old, was buried in the famous Hohle Fels Cave near Ulm in the Swabian Jura.
The prehistoric "tool" was reassembled from 14 fragments of siltstone.
Its life size suggests it may well have been used as a sex aid by its Ice Age makers, scientists report.
"In addition to being a symbolic representation of male genitalia, it was also at times used for knapping flints," explained Professor Nicholas Conard, from the department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, at Tübingen University.
"There are some areas where it has some very typical scars from that," he told the BBC News website.
Researchers believe the object's distinctive form and etched rings around one end mean there can be little doubt as to its symbolic nature.
The Tübingen team working Hohle Fels already had 13 fractured parts of the phallus in storage, but it was only with the discovery of a 14th fragment last year that the team was able finally to put the "jigsaw" together.
The different stone sections were all recovered from a well-dated ash layer in the cave complex associated with the activities of modern humans (not their pre-historic "cousins", the Neanderthals).
The dig site is one of the most remarkable in central Europe. Hohle Fels stands more than 500m above sea level in the Ach River Valley and has produced thousands of Upper Palaeolithic items.
There are other stone objects known to science that are obviously phallic symbols and are slightly older - from France and Morocco, of particular note. But to have any representation of male genitalia from this time period is highly unusual.
"Female representations with highly accentuated sexual attributes are very well documented at many sites, but male representations are very, very rare," explained Professor Conard.
Current evidence indicates that the Swabian Jura of southwestern Germany was one of the central regions of cultural innovation after the arrival of modern humans in Europe some 40,000 years ago.
The Hohle Fels phallus will go on show at Blaubeuren prehistoric museum in an exhibition called Ice Art - Clearly Male.
To me, it looks more like a proper prehistoric tool that was vandalized by some prehistoric kid. But of course the archaelogists came up with this explanation to make their find more interesting and controversial. Which will then bring attention and therefore funding to their research... hmm, reminds me of ome of the papers that get into Science and Nature :P




Another article from Straits Times Interactive:
July 22, 2005
Teachers propose banning 'F' grade
LONDON - THE word 'fail' should be banned from use in British classrooms and replaced with the phrase 'deferred success' to avoid demoralising pupils, a group of teachers has proposed.
Members of the Professional Association of Teachers argue that telling pupils they have failed can put them off learning for life.
A spokesman for the group said it wanted to avoid labelling children. 'We recognise that children do not necessarily achieve success first time,' he said. 'But I recognise that we can't just strike a word from the dictionary.' -- REUTERS
Ok, that's just being too politically correct lah... I don't think it will help even if they put 'deferred success' in bold red ink across a test paper/assignment instead of 'fail'. The pupil will still know that he/she didn't pass, and still feel as bad. "Look Ma, I got 'deferred success'! Never fail leh!"
Which brings to mind the variety of grading systems I have encountered throughout my years in school (which is 18 consecutive years, including kindergarten, and still counting... I'm mad, I know I'm mad):
<-- Lewis the Lewis rat looks something like this...
Read an article on ST online about more elephants in china becoming tuskless (i.e. genetically, and not because they got their tusks sawn off by humans, duh), and thought "wow, another example of evolution in progress!". The reason for thinking that was because I had borrowed a book from the library called "The beak of the finch" by Jonathan Weiner, which gives a detailed insight into the study of Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands. The Pulitzer prize-winning book gave a lot of examples and hard data to show how evolution is an ongoing and rapid process, unlike the usual perception of it taking millions of years. I myself feel that the author did an amazing job putting all the facts together, but at the same time felt bored reading the same idea get repeated a gazillion times in different ways. I think it's only good in small doses at a time. Ah well, I shall persist till I finish the book :P
Anyhows, here's the article from the Straits Times:
July 18, 2005
Elephants 'becoming tuskless'
BEIJING - CHINESE elephants are evolving into an increasingly tuskless breed because poaching is changing the gene pool, a paper reported yesterday.
Five to 10 per cent of male Asian elephants in China now have a gene that prevents the development of tusks, up from the usual 2 to 5 per cent, the China Daily said, quoting Beijing Normal University research.
'A male elephant with larger tusks is more likely to be shot by poachers,' said Associate Professor Zhang Li, whose research team has been studying elephants since 1999 at a reserve in Xishuangbanna, south-west Yunnan province.
'Therefore, the ones without tusks survive, preserving the tuskless gene in the species.'
But Prof Zhang's findings of the spread of the tuskless gene due to poaching must be tested, said several academics. -- AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, REUTERS